By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled partially for Myriad Genetics Inc on the closely watched issue of whether human genes can be patented, deciding synthetically produced genetic material can be patented but naturally occurring DNA cannot.
The nine justices ruled unanimously in the case. The biotechnology industry had warned that an expansive ruling against Myriad could threaten billions of dollars of investment.
The court said synthetically produced genetic material can be patented but that genes extracted from the human body, known as isolated DNA, do not merit the same legal protections.
The compromise outcome, which was urged by the Obama administration, will have less impact on Myriad. The Myriad patents in dispute will all expire by 2015.
Myriad's shares jumped more than 8 percent to $36.83 after the ruling was issued.
The ruling means that some of Myriad's patents concerning synthetic molecules called cDNA, will likely survive, although the parties disagree on that point.
In the court's majority opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was wrong to find that both isolated human DNA and cDNA were both patent eligible.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Howard Goller and Will Dunham)
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/u-top-court-says-extracted-human-dna-cannot-144328825.html
Stephen Covey klimt bastille day breaking bad breaking bad food network star British Open 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.